Litigation Details for In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation (N.D. Ohio 2022)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation (N.D. Ohio 2022)
Small Molecule Drugs cited in In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
Biologic Drugs cited in In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , and ⤷ Sign Up .
Details for In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation (N.D. Ohio 2022)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
0000-00-00 | External link to document | |||
2019-06-21 | 1717 | Exhibit s to Chalos Declaration | infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,028,222 ("the '222 patent") and 6,992,218 ("the '…concerning ten patents covering Inomax (i.e., five patents expiring in 2029 and five patents expiring in…in the five patents expiring in 2031 are patentable. '222 and '218 Patent Litigation:… such investigation. Patent/Antitrust Litigation Inomax Patent Litigation: Praxair Distribution…this group of patents and the PTAB ruled in July 2016 that one claim of this patent survived review | External link to document |
2019-07-03 | 1812 | Exhibit 16 - Chalos Dec.:MNK 2016 10Q | infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,028,222 ("the '222 patent") and 6,992,218 ("the '…concerning ten patents covering Inomax (i.e., five patents expiring in 2029 and five patents expiring in…in the five patents expiring in 2031 are patentable. '222 and '218 Patent Litigation:… such investigation. Patent/Antitrust Litigation Inomax Patent Litigation: Praxair Distribution…this group of patents and the PTAB ruled in July 2016 that one claim of this patent survived review | External link to document |
2019-07-09 | 1823 | Exhibits 1-37 [redacted] to the Egler Declaration | Warner Chilcott’s U.S. Patent No. 6,893,662, expiring in November 2021 (the “‘662 Patent”), is invalid and/…) U.S. Patent No. 5,541,170 (the “‘170 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 5,541,171 (the “‘171 Patent”), formulation…Chilcott’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,645,459 (the “‘459 Patent”) and 7,645,460 (the “‘460 Patent”), two formulation…infringement of the ‘459 Patent and ‘460 Patent. On August 21, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office…to the Company U.S. Patent No. 8,246,989 (the “‘989 Patent”), a formulation patent expiring in January | External link to document |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |